via BMannConsulting >_ Twitter is Jabber May 14, 2007 - 11:19pm — bmann
OK, I finally lost it when I read Dave Winer’s post re: Twitter premium:
Jason Calacanis is known for stimulating interesting discussion. Today is no different.
He says he’d pay $100 a year for a Twitter that was always fast, almost always up, and had some additional features.
I sent Jason a private email which I’ll now repeat here.
Just FYI, because of their API, you don’t really need Ev and Biz to do that for you. A bunch of us could pool resources and set up a server of our own, and peer with Twitter’s. If Twitter is down it would just queue up the messages, in the meantime, anyone who was on the premium system would see the messages immediately.
Look: forget Twitter. It has a bunch of users, that’s about it. How to build twitter:
That’s about it. And it has a publish and subscribe architecture built in, rather than all these crazy desktop apps that constantly poll the Twitter mothership. That’s it. It’s simple.
“Peering with Twitter”. WTH. Built into the XMPP protocol. It’s a standard. Works with lots of other things already.
My only explanation for the Twitter craze is that North Americans are still enamored of anything that can do the tiniest bit of mobile integration. Yes, Twitter has managed to scale and spend many thousands of dollars paying for SMS gateways. Great! Maybe if they had built a front end on top of Jabber, they would have gotten there faster…
‘If you thought ordering pizza online was the best thing since Deep Dish, you’ll be delighted to know that the next logical step in getting pizza to your mouth with minimal effort is here… if you reside in the UK, that is. Reportedly, Dominos is now allowing customers surrounding its 470 UK-based locations to place their orders via SMS, and this move comes after “successful trials” that began in July. To utilize the service, you must first enter in your details online, but after that initial registration, pizza is simply a text away. Impulse eaters, rejoice.’
–From Engadget and TechDigest.
